Kung Fury

Kung Fury is Nostalgic '80s Action/Comedy Done Right

It's common to hear about Kickstarter campaigns gone awry for a multitude of reasons, especially in regards to independent films. However, a year and a half after its own campaign ended, Kung Fury was finally publicly released yesterday afternoon. Kung Fury gained popularity during its funding period thanks to its dedication to an over-exaggerated '80s aesthetic and enthusiasm you can only find by the most passionate artists.

Kung Fury could have been a mess. Many similar films sometimes focus too much on the "gimmick" and lose sight of creating an entertaining, fully-realized film in lieu of being as ridiculous as possible. Kung Fury has such moments, like a CGI T-Rex play fighting with a mecha golden eagle. However, Kung Fury is greater than the sum of its parts. Finally, a well-made Kickstarter film that actually lives up to the hype!

It's not everyday that a Kickstarter-funded film premieres at Cannes, yet that's what Kung Fury did earlier this month, paving the way for the next wave of indie films. There've been talks and discussion of adapting Kung Fury into a feature-length film, and while I don't think the short alone would be able to sustain a 90-minute film, it would nevertheless be a great opportunity to director/actor David Sandberg and his production team.

Watch Kung Fury below and let us know what you think! If you can't get enough from Kung Fury, you can check out the special Kung Fury-inspired video for David Hasselhoff's "True Survivor."

[youtube id="bS5P_LAqiVg"]


Tom Hardy and Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road

Mad Max: Fury Road - Fear of a Feminist Action Movie

Mad Max: Fury Road is many things. It's an action movie masterpiece with the look and feel of a European comic book (think Alejandro Jodorowsky and Moebius). It's a post-apocalyptic descendent of Buster Keaton's The General and the cartoons of Chuck Jones, with careful attention to spatial relationships, cause and effect, and the art of set-ups and punchlines. It's a reminder of the power that visual language can command over mere words. It's a celebration of practical effects, daring stuntwork, and visceral filmmaking that we haven't seen in blockbusters for many years.

Mad Max: Fury Road is also a feminist movie. Or at least it's been hailed a feminist film, and that's made a lot of people uncomfortable.

I'm not just talking about tantrum-prone Men's Rights Activists, who've called for a boycott of the film because it's really feminist propaganda masquerading as a masculine ass-kicker. As is the nature of our weekly thinkpiece-culture calendar, what was lauded (or decried) as "x" a few days ago is now criticized for not really being "x."

Earlier in the week, politically conservative commentators began to throw cold water on the feminist credentials of Mad Max: Fury Road. Just yesterday, Anita Sarkeesian of Feminist Frequency tweeted that she didn't think Mad Max: Fury Road was a feminist film at all.

The word "feminist" is loaded, its associations so varied, and its ideological identity so personal. The mere idea of a "feminist" action movie is the source of scrutiny and anxiety, and it opens up a larger conversation of what feminism is and isn't, and also what people think it can be and should be, and even what is and isn't off limits when it comes to gender, genre, and the application of feminist ideas.

It's like ideological Thunderdome, but way more crowded, not as brutal, and without the bungee cords.

(spoilers ahead)


Mad Max: Fury Road

[Review] Mad Max: Fury Road

Thirty years have passed since director George Miller's last visit to the dystopian future of his most famous creation, Mad Max. Since then, he's preoccupied himself with such family fare as two Happy Feet movies and a Babe sequel, having struggled to get this third Max sequel off the ground since 1998. Fury Road suggests the long wait left him with one hell of a madness build-up to get out of his system.

Loud, plotless and visually jaw-dropping, Fury Road is a heavy metal spiritual successor to the punk western stylings of its three predecessors. It's a comic book movie without a comic book, a cacophonous symphony which rejoices in the deceptive precision of its orchestrated hell-raising. At a time when many action directors attempt to hide the increasingly overfamiliar of their destructive set-pieces behind manic, incoherent shooting, Miller conducts his extended suites with a hand that grows ever more intricate as the turmoil intensifies, guiding his audience from note to note with absolute assurance and clarity.

[youtube id="woHTUsl66BY"]

Mad Max: Fury Road
Director: George Miller
Rating: R
Release Date: May 14th, 2015

Fury Road suits its title well: for all the anger and havoc unfolding on-screen, Miller ensures the audience always knows where they are going and where they have come from. It is not a movie which particularly embraces the idea of cause and effect, with its action beats tending to occur as short and punchy individual passages rather than piling on top of each other, but within those beats, the mechanics and geography of each scene are laid out and adhered to with the certainty required for each movement to flow effortlessly into the next, earning enough trust that any lapses are easy to fill through imagination and previously acquired information.

If I'm labouring the point, it's because Fury Road represents everything the Michael Bay-inspired modern action movie aspires to, but with all the finesse those movies so desperate need and lack. Bay himself, as the originator of his style, has a reasonable grasp of georgraphy but an inability to restrain his perpetually ejaculating camera long enough to bring the audience in on the bliss of the climax. Far worse are his imitators, who offer only empty bragaddocio before limp disappointment at the main event. Miller understands the importance of the tease and the ecstatic delight of carefully controlled rhythm. The dangers of frustrating repetition are high in a two-hour chase movie, yet Miller knows when to hold back and give his audience time to recharge and discover pleasures easily overlooked in the rush, before kicking the engine back into life and starting all over again.

MadMax-FuryRoad-ImmortanJoe

It's in those secret pleasures where Fury Road is arguably at its most compelling. The vehicular carnage that makes up the bulk of the action offers giddy, head-banging highs unlike any movie in a long time, but the context provided by the subtly suggestive world building is what really makes it sing. Again like his action, Miller's dystopia is rabidly anarchic, yet built on immediately comprehensible power structures. There's no need for the movie to go into such depth on the intricacies of the quasi-religious mythology Immortan Joe (a fearsome Hugh Keays-Byrne) uses to control his war boys, yet with only a few lines of dialogue and off-hand visual suggestions, each detail makes the world more lived-in and tangible, deeping the credibility and stakes of the otherwise thin central plotline.

That's not to say there aren't missteps. Despite the movie's title, Theron's gloriously named Imperator Furiosa is its dramatic centre of gravity, reducing Max to little more than a passenger in his own movie. Furiosa is a commanding and exciting lead, helped by a mesmerisingly gladiatorial performance from Theron, but dominates the movie to such an extent that everything which doesn't involve her - Max's PTSD, for instance - feels aimless, even with her story ultimately little more than a journey from point A to B. As a character, she's complex, moral and focused, with a stated goal and means of achieving it, where Max is a mumbling wanderer who happens to land by her side to lend a hand. It's obvious whose story Miller is more interested in telling - a mooted sequel, unsurprisingly, has been named Mad Max: Furiosa - but there's some dissonance between the audience largely experiencing Furiosa's story from the point-of-view of Max, a character of such secondary presence as to sometimes feel mandated to fit the movie part into an established series.

66e05d387228243fc2cc9d964ddef10e

Max is salvaged by another rich performance from Hardy, who bears no physical resemblance to Mel Gibson and whose character is tangentially connected at best. The ravages of his internal torment at the family he was unable to save play out not only in the slightly ham-fisted visions which afflict him at every turn, but the contrast Hardy puts between the softness of his mumbled, barely audible voice and the twitchy tinderbox of his violent instincts. Hardy's training as Bane in using his face to convey depths of conviction and emotional vulnerability is put to potent use here: note the scene in which he witnesses, for the first time, the five girls Furiosa is smuggling away from their lives of sexual servitude at Immortan Joe's grotesque hands. The sight of their beauty amid the hellish, arid landscape of his life leaves Max confused, aroused and angered, a complex and historied conflict which Hardy plays out in a few seconds on his furrowed, awe-struck face.

Nicholas Hoult also brings considerable soul to warboy Nux, who finds himself broken off from the clan which gave his life purpose and having to navigate a more complex world than he ever imagined. Like Max, he exists in the shadow of Theron's imperious Furiosa and despite Hoult's best efforts, and a sweet if underdeveloped affection with one of the girls, the character doesn't add much to proceedings beyond comic relief and being an agent for Miller's world-building. That's not a bad thing when so much of the movie's depth comes from its world, but the barebones framework of the plot running through it leads to a handful of problems once Furiosa's story has been told, with nowhere to go but back on itself to facilitate an unconvincingly pat narrative conclusion. But then again, as the old cliché goes, what matters is the journey rather than the destination, and Fury Road provides one hell of a ride getting there.


Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

[Trailer] Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

[youtube id="IwfUnkBfdZ4"]

After all of the wait, speculation, leaks, and rumors, we finally have the first official glimpse at Zack Snyder's upcoming Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. In typical Snyder fashion, the footage is tonally dark with the narrative voiceover questioning Superman's intentions. Juxtaposed against the Superman clips is Ben Affleck as Bruce Wayne looking at his Batman costume with Alfred telling him, "That's how it starts: the fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness that turns good men cruel."

The trailer doesn't capture what makes the Marvel Cinematic Universe feel so full and interconnected. Granted, this is Warner Bros. and DC's first real attempt (Green Lantern notwithstanding) at creating a unified universe, but it just feels like a Superman film with Batman in it, or vice versa. There's also the question of Batman's status quo in this film and whether or not that will confuse casual fans who may not realize the Batman in Dawn of Justice isn't the same Batman in the The Dark Knight Trilogy.

It will be interesting to see if Snyder will be able to balance enough screen time for not only Batman and Superman, but also the debuting Wonder Woman in the film. Just based on the trailer alone, the film feels too cramped as is, but WB and DC have the highest respect and faith in Snyder... for better or worse.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice will be in theaters in 2016.


Lawrence Makoare in The Dead Lands

[Review] The Dead Lands

The Dead Lands
Director: Toa Fraser
Rating: R
Release Date: April 17, 2015 (VOD and limited release)

Hongi (James Rolleston) is the lone survivor of an attack by another tribe that led to the death of his Chieftan father and the rest of his tribe. With the rival killer, Wirepa (Te Kohe Tuhaka), still traversing the lands, Hongi heads to The Dead Lands in search of a mysterious being known for his fighting prowess. When Hongi meets the Warrior (Lawrence Makoare), their unusual relationship builds towards a camaraderie in which Hongi is able to channel his inner strength. However, Wirepa and his tribe are ruthless, posing a serious threat to the outnumbered Hongi and Warrior in a time when ruthless savagery goes a long way.

[youtube id="6n9WK1BtvFo"]

The Dead Lands' biggest selling point is its setting in pre-Colonial New Zealand, as well as its focus on the Maori, a group of indigenous New Zealanders. The film offers a rare glimpse at different aspects of Maori culture, like their religion, language, traditions, and especially their martial arts. While the fight scenes are exciting, they're few and far apart with a story that's rife with cliches and stereotypes about revenge, adulthood, father/son dynamics, lone wolves, enigmatic entities... the list goes on and on.

The Dead Lands would have benefited by either focusing on the action elements or the dramatic/spiritual elements. I understand some type of narrative or backstory was important to link the fight scenes together, but as we've seen in recent years, an action film can be light on story and still be entertaining and successful in spite of a weak narrative (re: The Raid: Redemption). The decision to include more backstory could be due to wanting to highlight and illustrate a culture that hasn't been in the spotlight, but the film feels too unfocused because of it.


Promotional poster of Dwayne

[Trailer] Hercules

[youtube id="4JZhGYrgCPg"]

Earlier this year, The Legend of Hercules was released into theaters to terrible reviews, garnering a lowly 3% on Rotten Tomatoes' average rating and a tepid $44m in world sales compared to its $70m budget. Needless to say, the Kellan Lutz-starring film bombed terribly at the theaters. Much like 2012's "doubling" of Snow White and the Huntsman and Mirror Mirror, another Hollywood envisioning of the Hercules myth will be hitting theaters later this year.

Directed by Brett Ratner (Rush Hour), the simply titled Hercules stars Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson as the eponymous half-man, half-god warrior. The trailer doesn't do much in terms of narrative exposition, but it certainly highlights the biggest sell of the film: The Rock's muscles and yelling Hercules-esque stuff. To be fair, why else would anybody watch a film about The Rock playing Hercules? Johnson also plays a few other roles (Zeus and Achilles), as well, so you're getting triple your investment.

Considering Hercules is Ratner's first directed film since the mixed-reviewed Tower HeistHercules could be Ratner's return to his Rush Hour-era greatness... but probably not. Will The Rock's ability to salvage practically any action film be enough? Find out when Hercules hits theaters on July 25th.


Paul Walker To Be Replaced By Body Doubles and CGI

The death of Paul Walker is one that saddened fans all over the world. The Fast and Furious franchise has a huge following, and the loss of this great actor left many devastated. As depressed as fans were though, many couldn't help but wonder what will happen for the next Fast and Furious installment, Fast and Furious 7.

The film already pushed its release date in December to April 10, 2015 after the death of Walker. After setting this new release date, Universal suggested that Paul Walker will still appear in the upcoming film, regardless of his untimely fate. “They have hired four actors with bodies very similar to Paul’s physique and they will be used for movement and as a base,” said a source to the New York Daily News. "Paul's face and voice will be on top using CGI." Walker is known for playing cop Brian O'Conner in all of the Fast and Furious installments except for Fast and Furious: Tokyo Drift. Because he is the star in the upcoming film alongside costar Vin Diesel, this may be a task that is difficult to pull off.

James Wan is to direct this next chapter in the widely successful series, and Vin Diesel and Neal H. Moritz are returning to produce it as well. The filming was delayed after 40-year-old Walker died in a car crash on November 30 in Valencia, California, just outside of Los Angeles. The cast and crew was about halfway done with production of the next film in the series when the tragedy struck, with Walker's performance unfinished. Vin Diesel is now determined to make this the best one in the series, and I could only hope that they're all brought to even more success after his loss.

[via Variety]


Harrison Ford to replace Bruce Willis in The Expendables 3

Sylvester Stallone's love letter to forgotten testosterone-driven action films, The Expendables, has found a good audience. While they feature too much plot and not enough one-liners, the Expendables films have at least been entertaining, if only for the fact that they combine some of the greatest action stars of the past 30 years. Today, news came out that another action icon will be joining the fraternity via Stallone's personal Twitter:

It appears that Mr. Indiana Jones himself will become expendable, joining franchise newcomers Nicolas Cage, Jackie Chan, Milla Jovovich, and Wesley Snipes. However, the news is a bit bittersweet as Bruce Willis will not be returning. I'm a fan of Ford, but he doesn't carry the same machismo that Willis does. As the stable continues to grow, I'm sure more names will be announced. Are there any other actors you feel could fit the franchise?

[via /Film]