[Review] People, Places, Things
This review is being re-posted to coincide with the film's VOD and theatrical release.
In most comedies involving a break-up between parents, the plot tends to naturally vilify the parent opposite of the lead, portraying them as some type of evil entity whom the lead must conquer and triumph over to win. However, this isn't often the case in real life situations, and People, Places, Things does a great job of being an inherently funny film without having to trap its characters in outlandish situations to garner laughs from its audience. However, will that be enough to hold over those who have come to expect such cartoon-like comedies?
People, Places, Things
Director: Jim Strouse
Rating: N/A
Release Date: January 26, 2015 (Sundance), August 14, 2015 (VOD, theaters)
On his twin daughters' birthday, graphic novelist Will Henry (Jemaine Clement) walks in on his wife, Charlie (Stephanie Allynne), cheating on him with another man, Gary (Michael Chernus). A year later, Will is a divorcee living in a small studio apartment in Queens with weekend visitation rights. His depression, while never taking over or defining his character, begins to show through his art and teaching during his classes at the School of Visual Arts. After discovering Charlie is pregnant and intends to marry Gary, Will requests more time with the girls, and is shortly given such time when Charlie drops them off one night. Struggling to juggle his job and responsibilities with the girls, he requests help from his student, Cat (Jessica Williams) and her mother, Diane (Regina Hall). Before long, Cat and Will hit it off, but the allure of reuniting with Charlie and completing their old family dynamic threatens to derail anything new in Will's life.
Like I mentioned earlier, most comedies of this ilk like to pit ex-lovers against one another in some type of competition, but People, Places, Things doesn't go that route. In fact, despite a few disagreements, both Will and Charlie genuinely like each other. Rather than creating a conflict that's person vs. person, People, Places, Things falls more in line with person vs. self conflict, and it could be argued that the film is just as much a coming-of-age film as it is a dramedy. Writer/director Jim Strouse wrote the script with some of his personal anecdotes in mind, which help explain why the script feels so grounded in reality. Despite a solid script with well-crafted jokes, the film wouldn't have worked as well had Clement not been cast in the role of Will.
In a way, People, Places, Things is a bit of a vehicle for Clement as he's able to show off his quick-witted timing and his ability to balance that with drama. Fans of Flight of the Conchords will feel familiar with Clement's witticisms and side jokes, but can also appreciate Will's longing to be a good father.
People, Places, Things is a solid dramedy that serves as a highlight role for Clement. Anybody interested in a realistic comedy that doesn't create villainous caricatures of its characters will be drawn to the film, as well. However, audiences that have grown too familiar with Judd Apatow, Will Ferrell, or Paul Feig films may find People, Places, Things a bit too pedestrian for their tastes.
James Wan Rumored to Produce Mortal Kombat Film Reboot
My roommate and I have been obsessed with Mortal Kombat X since its release this past April, and while we've been taking breaks recently to play Rocket League, our hearts lie in the hands of Sub Zero and the rest of the MK squad. Apparently, we're not the only ones obsessed with disemboweling our opponents as Mortal Kombat X is currently the best-selling game of the year.
However, as a 25-year-old franchise, we've been down the road of Mortal Kombat propaganda, including the animated series, the films, and the online series to middling success. Yet, we're in a new age of Hollywood reboots and adaptations that can actually treat the source material with enough reverence and a decent budget to carry the name along. We've seen Mortal Kombat on the big screen already, but imagine a new vision with modern technology...
New Line Cinema is reportedly in talks with Furious 7 director James Wan to produce a new Mortal Kombat reboot with "darker, brutally real martial arts" with a story that departs from the confusing plot that's plagued the games in recent installments. Instantly, The Raid comes to mind, and my expectations might be set way too high to have Iko Uwais star in the film (or at the very least, set the choreography).
Whatever the case may be, I'm excited to see how this new Mortal Kombat film will play out.
[via IGN]
The Hateful Eight Teaser Trailer is Vintage Tarantino
[youtube id="gnRbXn4-Yis"]
It's so rare for a Hollywood director to make constant hits with little to no misses. We're nearing eight films into Quentin Tarantino's career, and the director just continues to find success with every film he's made.
Amidst controversy over script leaks, Tarantino wavered over creating the film. After all, he's an auteur that likes to control all aspects of his art, and the leaks were enough to derail his plans. However, following a live table read, the director decided to go through with the film's production. Excitement is high for this one, especially considered the all-star cast. Watch the teaser trailer now!
The Hateful Eight will be released exclusively in theaters equipped with 70mm projectors on Christmas, followed by a wide release on January 8, 2016.
In THE HATEFUL EIGHT, set six or eight or twelve years after the Civil War, a stagecoach hurtles through the wintry Wyoming landscape. The passengers, bounty hunter John Ruth (Russell) and his fugitive Daisy Domergue (Leigh), race towards the town of Red Rock where Ruth, known in these parts as “The Hangman,” will bring Domergue to justice. Along the road, they encounter two strangers: Major Marquis Warren (Jackson), a black former union soldier turned infamous bounty hunter, and Chris Mannix (Goggins), a southern renegade who claims to be the town’s new Sheriff. Losing their lead on the blizzard, Ruth, Domergue, Warren and Mannix seek refuge at Minnie’s Haberdashery, a stagecoach stopover on a mountain pass. When they arrive at Minnie’s, they are greeted not by the proprietor but by four unfamiliar faces. Bob (Bichir), who’s taking care of Minnie’s while she’s visiting her mother, is holed up with Oswaldo Mobray (Roth), the hangman of Red Rock, cow-puncher Joe Gage (Madsen), and Confederate General Sanford Smithers (Dern). As the storm overtakes the mountainside stopover, our eight travelers come to learn they may not make it to Red Rock after all…
Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese Reunite for The Devil in the White City
There aren't many guarantees in Hollywood, but the duo of Leonardo DiCaprio and Martin Scorsese has proven their successful longevity over the years. Now, the The Wolf of Wall Street duo will reunite for a new thriller based on a true story.
DiCaprio and Scorsese's next joint project will be The Devil in the White City, a film adaptation of Erik Larson's The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic and Madness at the Fair that Changed America about America's first serial killer, H.H. Holmes, and the purported 27-200 people he killed during the 1893 Chicago World Fair. DiCaprio will depict Holmes based on a script written by Billy Ray (Captain Philips).
While the film won't begin production for awhile, you can read the book's synopsis below:
Not long after Jack the Ripper haunted the ill-lit streets of 1888 London, H.H. Holmes (born Herman Webster Mudgett) dispatched somewhere between 27 and 200 people, mostly single young women, in the churning new metropolis of Chicago; many of the murders occurred during (and exploited) the city’s finest moment, the World’s Fair of 1893. Larson’s breathtaking new history is a novelistic yet wholly factual account of the fair and the mass murderer who lurked within it.
[via Collider]
[Review] Fantastic Four
The name Fantastic Four suggests a certain joie de vivre, a delight in its own comic book silliness. When Marvel's first family were translated to the big screen by Tim Story in 2005, and again for a 2007 sequel, that lightness of touch unfortunately slipped into kitschy smugness, with the excessive focus on camp humour sucking the characters dry of believeable humanity. As oversaturated as the blockbuster movie scene has become with reboots and reimaginings, Fantastic Four presented a worthwhile opportunity for Fox to do right by the characters with the same balance of wit and sincerity which made Joss Whedon's first attempt at The Avengers such a rousing success.
Unfortunately, the studio decided that rather than going for a balanced approach, they would instead push to the opposite extreme, banishing all joy and warmth in favour of something closer in tone to Christopher Nolan's Batman movies. It doesn't take much of a comic book fan to point out that Batman and Fantastic Four couldn't really have much less in common, unless one were to look back to the Bat's loopy silver age incarnation at a stretch (no pun intended, Mister Fantastic). Consequently, this latest Fantastic Four is a movie perpetually at war with itself, unable to reconcile the fun suggested by its title and its characters with the miserable tone the writers inflict upon them.
[youtube id="AAgnQdiZFsQ"]
Fantastic Four
Director: Josh Trank
Rating: PG-13
Release Date: August 7th, 2015
The movie is an origin story to the extent that few movies have been origin stories before. Tim Story's 2005 version pushed through the core character dynamics and roots of the Four's powers in about twenty minutes before starting towards the main smackdown with Doctor Doom. Trank's version dedicates virtually the entire movie to setting the stage for how the characters get their powers and eventually come to terms with them, leaving the ultimate showdown - more or less the only real action sequence - squished into what amounts to little more than ten minutes at the end. In fact, Toby Kebbell's Victor probably gets no more than fifteen minutes' total screentime, with his introduction every bit as rushed as his exit. Considering Doom is supposed to be one of Marvel's most fearsome and complex villains, we're offered little sense of the character beyond a dash of petulance and hints at unrequited feelings for Kate Mara's Sue. Of such meagre ingredients are great supervillains not made.
What we're left with for the remaining 80-odd minutes is a tedious and mostly plotless trawl through a series of events telegraphed so blatantly that even those not spoilt by the trailer or arriving with any knowledge of the comics will have a clear idea where it's heading. It might have worked as a character piece had the characters been given any greater definition than the cursory outlines on show. Reed Richards is the clever one. Johnny Storm is, boom boom, the hotheaded rebel. Sue is, um, a less brilliant version of Reed, with a weird fascination with musical patterns that exists for no other reason than to give her a single, lazily-written scene she can call her own around the midpoint. Ben is Reed's best friend and a bit angsty. Only Reed and Ben give off the faintest sense of humanity, mostly because the movie gives their friendship a little backstory. As for Reed and Sue, they spend what little time they have together making snide comments and being annoyed with each other... so maybe a perfect set-up for a married couple after all.
The script offers nothing to the reasonably talented cast, who flounder trying to create any semblance of chemistry. This is in no small part down to them spending so little time together as a foursome, to the extent that there's little reason to believe Ben has even met Sue until the very end. The familial relationship between the Four is often cited as what makes their superhero team different from others, yet the movie goes to great lengths to keep them apart. Ben departs the story once Reed joins the Baxter foundation, only returning when Reed drunk dials him (not joking) to come along with him, Johnny and Victor on an unsanctioned first journey in their pan-dimensional travel machine, leaving Sue behind. When they return, Victor abandoned, the four are segregated all the way through to the climax, at which point Reed starts talking about the importance of working together even though, as far as viewers are concerned, it seems as though they barely know each other.
The first half of the movie is significantly better than the second - a glimpse of an N64 controller is maybe the highlight of the entire thing - at least feeling as though it is building towards something even if it's patently obvious what that something is. Everything thereafter descends into a disorganised shambles, hitting one or two solid grace notes - an emphasis on the horror of each character's condition is well-played, and Doom's first demonstration of his vaguely defined powers is appreciably nasty, even if the movie has to subsequently forget them to stop him winning too easily - but otherwise spending a lot of time on entirely disposable training montages and grumbles about distrustful governments before hurrying the finale. The CGI is uniformly abysmal, particularly when it comes to Johnny's weightless human torch mode (which seems to cast little to no light or heat in several instances), Doom's melted action figure excuse for a face mask and the Thing, trouserless and dickless throughout, barely matching his mouth movements to his speech.
Its present 9% score on Rotten Tomatoes, lower than Jonah Hex, The Spirit and League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen, puts it among company whose badness is at least interesting, whereas Fantastic Four is merely dull, disjointed and dispiriting. Production troubles may have taken their toll, but it's hard to credit director Josh Trank's claim that his first cut was 'fantastic' when there's so little here that even hints at competence. It's a movie which roots the Thing's catchphrase in childhood abuse suffered at the hands of his older brother, which should tell you all you need to know. Fantastic Four is a series of compounding misjudgments, resulting in a movie ashamed of its own identity and straining to capture a zeitgeist long since passed. At least half the title is honest. It may not be fantastic, but is a 4/10 movie through and through.
[The Weekly Swarm] 8/3 - 8/9
Highlights for this installment of The Weekly Swarm include a tribute to "Rowdy" Roddy Piper, our photo recap of Lollapalooza 2015, our coverage of the first 2016 Republican Presidential Debate, reviews of Cop Car, Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, Shaun the Sheep Movie, and Antarctigo Vespucci's Leavin' La Vida Loca, and more! Check it all out below.
On Cecil The Lion, Walter Palmer and the Morality of Hunting
"Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015): The All-Time Great That Wrestling Fans Loved to Hate
[RH Photos] Lollapalooza 2015
2016 Republican Presidential Debate #1 - Hello, Cleveland!
Live-Action Naruto Film Adaptation Announced by Lionsgate
The Collected Works of Hayao Miyazaki Blu-Ray Set is Available for Pre-Order
[Review] Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation
Red Band Trailer for Deadpool's Deadly Debut
Leaked Story Reel Featuring Chris Farley as Shrek
[Review] Cop Car
[Review] Shaun The Sheep Movie
[RH Photos] Lollapalooza 2015
[Review] Antarctigo Vespucci: "Leavin' La Vida Loca"
Community is Probably Not Coming Back
[Review] MTV's Scream: Betrayed
2016 Republican Presidential Debate #1 - Hello, Cleveland!
The '70s Music Industry is Explored in Teaser for Martin Scorsese's Vinyl
[Review] Shaun The Sheep Movie
This review is being re-posted to coincide with its U.S. release.
Aardman's wonderful plasticine productions have never worked quite as well in the cinema as they do on television. In part that's because their television work includes the immaculate The Wrong Trousers, arguably the most perfectly paced and ambitiously staged animated shorts ever produced. And that's to say nothing of the animated trousers, boom boom. Transitioning to the big screen has meant stretching out half-hour plots to feature length, which works against Aardman's strength for creating small, self-contained pieces packed to the brim with exquisite visual punnery and telling stories more through animation than plotting. Chicken Run and Pirates! In An Adventure With Scientist both suffered from meandering stretches, offering enough visual wonder to make a wonderful trailer but not quite so capable at filling in the bits inbetween. Wallace & Gromit: The Curse Of The Were-Rabbit remains their finest cinematic outing to date, in no small part down to the studio's practiced expertise at setting out the rhythms of a story featuring their signature creations and laser-focus on spoofing one specific genre rather than firing in all directions and hoping for a hit.
Shaun The Sheep Movie (not, for whatever reason, Shaun The Sheep: The Movie, but I digress) also derives from one of Aardman's television hits, itself an offshoot of the Wallace & Gromit empire - specifically, the sheep from A Close Shave. The show is aimed at a noticeably younger audience than Wallace and the same is true of the movie. When a movie is classified 'for all ages', generally you can expect it to be aimed at children from, say, 6-12 years old. Shaun is the rare movie which skews even younger, though thanks to Aardman's gift for universal humour and soul-enriching animation, it is more than happy to whisk you back to the halcyon days of childhood even if you find yourself a few decades above the age requirements.
[youtube id="tQvwiOWpj7o"]
Shaun the Sheep Movie
Directors: Richard Starzak and Mark Burton
Rating: G
Release Date: February 6, 2015 (UK)
Growing out of the same formula which guides each of the 7-minute TV show episodes, the movie sees Shaun and his flock eager from a day off from their usual routine and having to escape the watchful eye of their farmer (called, ambitiously, 'Farmer') and his dog, Bitzer. On this occasion, events go a little more awry than expected and Farmer contrives to end up asleep in an out-of-control caravan that takes him to the Big City, where a bump on the head leads to him contracting amnesia and believing himself a celebrity hairdresser. With no-one to feed or look after them, and some naughty pigs wrecking havoc inside the farmhouse, the flock decides to go and get Farmer back, having to avoid the city's devious Animal Containment officer along the way.
As is probably clear from that description, the plot is not especially tight and the usual Aardman problems in maintaining pace apply. Between a number of truly inspired skits where the sheep try to blend into city life, the movie largely grinds to a halt whenever the Farmer becomes the focus. This shortcoming was made especially clear by a child in the row in front of me, who was enraptured every time the sheep took to the screen but quickly became distracted whenever the altogether less fluffy humans took their turn. Turns out no-one can deliver trenchant film criticism like a disinterested toddler.
Fortunately, the sheep sections are more than strong enough to make up for those shortcomings and as you'd expect from Aardman, there is no shortage of wonderfully staged slapstick set-pieces on offer. The flock's infiltration of an upmarket restaurant, dressed in poorly matched clothing from a local charity shop, is an absolute joy as the sheep attempt to blend in by imitating the etiquette of their fellow diners. A scene at a junkyard where the sheep serenade Timmy the lamb into feeling better is funny enough until you realise they've formed a baaa-bershop quartet, a detail so immaculate and quietly played you'd be quite forgiven for bursting out into spontaneous applause.
Aardman excel in such details and while it's disappointing to see the city's shops so generically signed ('Butcher', 'Newsagent', etc) considering how much fun can usually be had from picking out the background puns in the Wallace pictures, there's plenty of visual wit to enjoy in the foreground: the Animal Containment officer is brilliantly characterised in a short scene involving him posing in front of a mirror, while a brief stint inside a prison manages to imbue every one of its animal inmates with a vivid personality despite none of them being on-screen for more than a few seconds. The stray dog of indeterminate breed whom the flock befriends is similarly given a big soul through small details in the animation and while not particularly essential to the plot, accidentally turns into the movie's emotional centre through a sweet little story about kindness helping an outsider to find people to care for and be cared for.
Aardman's expertise at visual characterisation is essential because where the likes of Wallace and the studio's other movies have merely contented themselves with being primarily focused on visuals ahead of dialogue, Shaun contains no dialogue whatsoever outside the occasional grunt or well-timed baaa. For those who thought Wall-E's silent opening was impressive, Shaun takes it up to masterclass level, delivering all the information needed without a word spoken - though two very funny adverts on the side of a passing bus give Shaun an early nudge in the right direction - while often utilising silence as its own comedic tool, most perfectly a gag involving a hilariously unsettling dog watching an imprisoned Bitzen from the cell opposite. Even the credits are a delight, relayed via a reel of production sketches, and you'll want to stay for one extra joke at the very end. Not because there's anything much to it, but because knowingly missing out on a single Aardman joke feels like a crime in and of itself.
There's so much to love about Shaun that the frustration of its pacing problems only feels greater in retrospect. At 45 minutes to an hour long, it could've been a masterpiece. At 85 minutes - the standard length for an Aardman movie - it just feels a little too patchy to recommend as voiceferously as I would, say, the unexpectedly wonderful Paddington. The visuals are beautiful, the laughs are plentiful and the characters as wonderfully constructed as personalities as they are physical plasticine creations, yet the lagging pace accentuates the weaker gags a little too much and scenes involving the Farmer feel like they're lifted from a less witty, more dreary movie. It's still completely charming and absolutely worth seeing if you're a fan of any of the studio's previous work or funny, visually bracing animation in general, but Aardman's struggles at extending their storytelling to cinematic length means Shaun falls short of unqualified baaa-rilliance.
[Review] Cop Car
In the opening scene of Cop Car, writer/director Jon Watts establishes the two different worldviews that make his film a compelling thriller. There's the child world and the adult world. The child world is one of fantasy and games without consequences. Friends Travis (James Freedson-Jackson) and Harrison (Hays Wellford) have run away from home, and they think they can survive on their own with just a Slim Jim and their ability to curse without repercussions. The adult world, by contrast, is one of violence, manipulation, and murder. But Travis and Harrison don't know that yet. They will soon.
Cop Car's demarcation between the child world and adult world is so pronounced that it's almost like a fairy tale. Rather than crossing the village border for the dark woods, our nine-year-old runaways crawl past a barbed wire fence. Eventually they find an abandoned cop car and take it for a joy ride. Had Travis and Harrison not stumbled onto the cop car, they probably would have given up running away and been back with their respective parents by sundown. Instead, they wind up deep into the ugly adult world where it's unlikely that they'll make it through the night.
[youtube id="MBK_9GlVlc0"]
Cop Car
Director: Jon Watts
Rating: R
Release Date: August 7, 2015
Cop Car has a lot in common with Coen Brothers thrillers like Blood Simple and No Country for Old Men. There's also a strong vibe of Jeremy Saulnier's lo-fi 2014 revenge movie Blue Ruin. Regular people wind up way over their heads in an uncontrollable situation, and they're forced to deal with it to survive. There's this black comedy that comes from confrontations with one's own ineptitude (or inflated sense of ability) during life or death situations. With the two child leads, there's this childlike sense of "No way!" when they steal the cop car and drive off, a kind of young incredulity about the unchecked freedom of adulthood. They speed, they drive on the wrong side of the road, they play with guns, they think they're invincible.
Then in comes Kevin Bacon, who plays Sheriff Kretzer, the cop whose car was stolen. Kretzer's shady backstory gets revealed slowly but not fully as the film unfolds. Watts is smart not to provide all the details and instead just gives enough pieces for the audience to reconstruct his crimes. It makes the world of Cop Car feel more lived-in. Like the child runaway plot and fairy tales, we're familiar with this kind of dirty-cop story too.
The kids think they're in control but wind up losing it. Kretzer's got the opposite arc of control, and spends early parts of Cop Car helplessly trying to cover his own ass with the people at police dispatch. There's something comically Benny Hill-ish about him running panicked through a open field when he can't find the car; you can almost hear an internal monologue of "oh crap, oh crap, oh crap" with each stride. On top of that, something about the mustache and his posture makes Kretzer look like a side character from Super Troopers. Yet Krezter is a good improviser, and he knows how to use the system to his advantage.
Bacon imbues Kretzer with a wolf-like menace. His desperation makes him seem like some raging animal in a frenzy, but he becomes more refined as the situation becomes clearer and he sees an opportunity to re-take control. When he's finally able to talk to the boys over the police radio, there's this stern, authoritative quality to Bacon's voice that conveys a clenching fist and gnashed teeth and a loaded gun. The Krezter character and Bacon's performance are rooted in the black comedy of sudden ineptitude and black-hearted desperation.
In addition to the child world being subsumed by the adult world, there's also an interesting inversion of dominance going on between Travis and Harrison. Travis seems more like the leader of the two boys. The smaller of the two, he's recklessly brave, more vocal, willing to drop and f-bomb and play mischief maker during their dalliance with running away. Yet as the situation becomes more dangerous and the boys find themselves deep in danger, Travis' young bravery recedes and Harrison needs to find a way to assume the lead.
Watts proves a capable director of actors as well as action, controlling his shots and dialing back extraneous sounds to get the maximum dread and tension from a moment. I found it surprising that he was tapped to direct the Spider-Man reboot for Marvel Studios, though. Nothing about Cop Car screams, "This guy is a perfect fit for Spider-Man." (With great Cop Car moments comes great responsibility?)
It seems like part of a pattern of promising indie directors being handed the reins to major studio tentpoles. Think Marc Webb on The Amazing Spider-Man and its sequel, Colin Trevorrow doing Jurassic World, and Josh Trank on Fantastic Four. It's a bit of a surprising trend, one that gives fledgling directors big breaks but may also break their spirits given the creative compromises required to work on a major studio film. As noted in our Ant-Man review, the MCU films are producer/studio-driven rather than director-driven. The cynical part of me thinks that studios believe these indie directors will be more compliant, that they're starving for the breakout hit and will do whatever they're told. That's not always the case. Selma director Ava DuVernay was offered Marvel's Black Panther but passed due to creative differences.
The worst thing that could happen to Watts on Spider-Man is reducing him to a journeyman director, draining him of his talent simply to deliver a competent film on time. I want to go back to Watts' debut, a 2014 horror film called Clown, to see what else his abilities suggest he's capable of. Cop Car makes me want more original work in Watts' future. One hopes his big-studio adventure over the barbed wire fence goes well.